Editing services come with three major challenges: objectivity,
granularity, and timing.
The challenge of subjectivity: Editors who don’t follow a writing methodology will struggle to give you objective feedback, or, if they do, struggle to communicate their feedback objectively.
The challenge of granularity: Some editors need to read your entire manuscript before they can give you feedback.
The timing challenge: Some editors can’t help with the pre-writing phase.
The book reads like an academic journal or text and I like the simplicity of the prose. The sentences are short and written in a manner to be remembered. Nothing goes on too long, a benefit with an educational book. I thought the adversity part was a little egregious, but I do get the point of it. Whether it’s lists, font, each page has a lot of punchy points intended to be quoted down. Effective division is the cornerstone of the work. What are the key elements of a central theme, major concepts that correlate to a specific direction. An overview of readers and their investments is helpful to give people, I knew it personally, but like guides on oration, it is a great advantage to tie in what the author works on, but also the mindset and desires of the person who reads their work and aids them in turn. Everything I could have thought of, genre, characterisation, the necessity of the big idea are covered here in a level of consideration that I think will do the full book credit. I did find your work good, and I certainly do think it a very fine piece and worth the time for a writer or literary scholar to read.